Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 A375

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 A375 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 A375: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

✅2.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3571.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,799 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 20.9 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 150W vs 30W.

Radeon R9 A375

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,750 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3640.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.9 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 150W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 4800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 A375 instead at 1,024 vs 1,005, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 A375 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,750 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $1,799, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3640.8% (20.9 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 A375 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4800 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 A375 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon R9 A375

The Radeon R9 A375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1015 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,024 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon R9 A375 reaches 1,024 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R9 A375 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 640 (Radeon R9 A375).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R9 A375
G3D Mark Score	1,005	1,024+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	640+233%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+60%	40

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R9 A375
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 A375 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 A375.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R9 A375
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+200%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 A375's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R9 A375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon R9 A375). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R9 A375
TDP	150W	30W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	6.7	34.1+409%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4800 came in at $1799, while the Radeon R9 A375 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R9 A375 was 97.3% cheaper ($1750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 20.9 (Radeon R9 A375) — the Radeon R9 A375 offers 3383.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 A375 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon R9 A375
MSRP	$1799	$49-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	20.9+3383%
Codename	GT200B	Venus
Release	November 11 2008	2015
Ranking	#884	#877

Search Quadro FX 4800 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 A375 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.