Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon 530

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon 530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon 530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

✅42.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon 530

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 4800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 530 instead at 1,037 vs 1,005, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 4800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon 530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon 530

The Radeon 530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,037 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon 530 reaches 1,037 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 530 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 384 (Radeon 530). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 530).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon 530
G3D Mark Score	1,005	1,037+3%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.7864 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs	24+200%	8
TMUs	64+167%	24
L2 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon 530
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 530 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 64-bit on the Radeon 530. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 128 KB (Radeon 530) — the Quadro FX 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon 530
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+200%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon 530's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 530 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon 530). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon 530
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	6.7	20.7+209%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4800 came in at $1799, while the Radeon 530 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 530 was 100+% cheaper ($1799 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.6 (Quadro FX 4800) vs Infinity (Radeon 530) — the Radeon 530 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 530 (2017 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon 530
MSRP	$1799	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.6	Infinity
Codename	GT200B	Weston
Release	November 11 2008	April 18 2017
Ranking	#884	#873

Search Quadro FX 4800 on Amazon

Search Radeon 530 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.