Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

✅51.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Quadro K2000M

2012

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 4800 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 51.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (1,005 vs 1,004), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 4800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K2000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Quadro K2000M

The Quadro K2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,004 points. Launch price was $265.27.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Quadro K2000M reaches 1,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro K2000M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 384 (Quadro K2000M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 0.5722 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000M).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K2000M
G3D Mark Score	1,005	1,004
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	192	384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	0.5722 TFLOPS+24%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K2000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000M carries 2 GB. Quadro K2000M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000M. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000M) — the Quadro K2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K2000M
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB	2 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	256 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Quadro K2000M's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro K2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Quadro K2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K2000M
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	6.7	18.3+173%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K2000M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K2000M
MSRP	$1799	—
Codename	GT200B	GK107
Release	November 11 2008	June 1 2012
Ranking	#884	#886

Search Quadro FX 4800 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.