Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 6700M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4800

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6700M

2011

Why buy it

✅21.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (1,017 vs 1,005), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 4800 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6700M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4800

The Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,005 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4800 scores 1,005 and the Radeon HD 6700M reaches 1,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4800 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6700M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4800) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6700M). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4800) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon HD 6700M
G3D Mark Score	1,005	1,017+1%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	960+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	1.306 TFLOPS+183%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	64+33%	48
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon HD 6700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4800 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6700M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 4800 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4800 and System on the Radeon HD 6700M. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX 4800) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6700M) — the Radeon HD 6700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon HD 6700M
VRAM Capacity	1.5 GB+200%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4800 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 6700M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon HD 6700M
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	6.7	13.6+103%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6700M (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4800	Radeon HD 6700M
MSRP	$1799	—
Codename	GT200B	Blackcomb
Release	November 11 2008	January 4 2011
Ranking	#884	#654

Search Quadro FX 4800 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6700M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.