Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅82.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A265

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 82.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (1,001 vs 994), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A265 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A265 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 A265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

Radeon R7 A265

The Radeon R7 A265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 994 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 and the Radeon R7 A265 reaches 994 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 A265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A265). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A265).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
G3D Mark Score	1,001	994
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.432 TFLOPS	0.6336 TFLOPS+47%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A265 carries 512 MB. Quadro 3000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A265. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 3000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 A265) — the Quadro 3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 A265's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon R7 A265 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	13.3	33.1+149%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A265 (2014 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 A265
MSRP	—	$149
Codename	GF104	Opal
Release	February 22 2011	January 9 2014
Ranking	#888	#890

Search Quadro 3000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.