FirePro M4150 vs Quadro 3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M4150 vs Quadro 3000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro M4150 vs Quadro 3000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M4150

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro M4150 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,011 vs 1,001), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro M4150 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro M4150 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro M4150 vs Quadro 3000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M4150

The FirePro M4150 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,011 points.

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M4150 scores 1,011 and the Quadro 3000M reaches 1,001 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4150 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 3000M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4150) vs 240 (Quadro 3000M). Raw compute: 0.5491 TFLOPS (FirePro M4150) vs 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Quadro 3000M
G3D Mark Score	1,011	1,001
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5491 TFLOPS+27%	0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	40+67%
L1 Cache	96 KB	320 KB+233%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro M4150	Quadro 3000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M4150 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 3000M carries 2 GB. FirePro M4150 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M4150 and 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M4150) vs 512 KB (Quadro 3000M) — the Quadro 3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Quadro 3000M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M4150 draws 150W versus the Quadro 3000M's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro 3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4150) vs 350W (Quadro 3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	FirePro M4150	Quadro 3000M
TDP	150W	75W-50%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	6.7	13.3+99%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is FirePro M4150 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	FirePro M4150	Quadro 3000M
MSRP	$200	—
Codename	Opal	GF104
Release	October 16 2013	February 22 2011
Ranking	#879	#888

Search FirePro M4150 on Amazon

Search Quadro 3000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.