Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

2011Core: 450 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

  • 79.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.

Radeon HD 7690M XT

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro 3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 79.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7690M XT instead at 1,009 vs 1,001, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7690M XT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7690M XT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7690M XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

AMD

Radeon HD 7690M XT

The Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2013. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,009 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 and the Radeon HD 7690M XT reaches 1,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 7690M XT uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 0.696 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7690M XT).

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
G3D Mark Score
1,001
1,009
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.432 TFLOPS
0.696 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
320 KB+567%
48 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7690M XT. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 3000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7690M XT) — the Quadro 3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7690M XT's 25W — a 100% difference. The Radeon HD 7690M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7690M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
TDP
75W
25W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
13.3
40.4+204%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7690M XT (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 7690M XT
MSRP
$150
Codename
GF104
Thames
Release
February 22 2011
January 7 2013
Ranking
#888
#883

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.