Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 6700M

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

2011Core: 450 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6700M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 6700M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 6700M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 6700M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6700M

2011

Why buy it

  • 1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (1,017 vs 1,001), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro 3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6700M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6700M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 6700M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

AMD

Radeon HD 6700M

The Radeon HD 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,017 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 and the Radeon HD 6700M reaches 1,017 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 6700M uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6700M). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6700M).

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 6700M
G3D Mark Score
1,001
1,017+2%
Architecture
Fermi
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
960+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.432 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+202%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 6700M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6700M carries 512 MB. Quadro 3000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M and System on the Radeon HD 6700M.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 6700M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6700M's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon HD 6700M
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
13.3
13.6+2%