Quadro 3000M vs Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Quadro 3000M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 3000M is positioned at rank 120 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is on rank 524, so the Quadro 3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 3000M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 3000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual.
| Insight | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 3000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 3000M and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
Quadro 3000M
The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.
Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 825 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 997 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 and the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual reaches 997 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 640 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual).
| Feature | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,001 | 997 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 640+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 3000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual has 512 MB. The Quadro 3000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 19.9+50% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 3000M | Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | GF104 | — |
| Release | February 22 2011 | August 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #888 | #863 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 3000M and Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8750M Dual
