Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M260X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 3000M

2011

Why buy it

✅74.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 74.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M260X instead at 1,013 vs 1,001, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M260X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M260X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 and the Radeon R7 M260X reaches 1,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score	1,001	1,013+1%
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.432 TFLOPS	0.5491 TFLOPS+27%
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+233%	96 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M260X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 3000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M260X) — the Quadro 3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 M260X
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	13.3	13.5+2%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M260X (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro 3000M	Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP	—	$139
Codename	GF104	Opal
Release	February 22 2011	December 6 2015
Ranking	#888	#878

Search Quadro 3000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M260X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.