Quadro 3000M
VS
Radeon RX 7600

Quadro 3000M vs Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

2011Core: 450 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7600

2023Core: 1720 MHzBoost: 2655 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 3000M is positioned at rank #120 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 3000M

#62
RTX A4500
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800
99%
#63
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000
99%
#64
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547
96%
#65
RTX A4000H
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927
94%
#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
87%
#105
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1181%
#120
Quadro 3000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#124
Radeon Pro W5500X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
98%
#125
Quadro T2000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $75
97%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
91%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
89%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
88%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
86%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
109%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
105%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
104%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
104%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
103%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
103%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
102%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
101%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
99%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
99%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
97%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
97%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
97%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
96%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
95%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
94%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
93%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
93%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
91%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
90%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
90%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 3000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1556.4% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro 3000M.

InsightQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1556.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1556.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 3000M and Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

Quadro 3000M

The Quadro 3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,001 points. Launch price was $398.96.

AMD

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 3000M scores 1,001 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 1556.4%. The Quadro 3000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro 3000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 0.432 TFLOPS (Quadro 3000M) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score
1,001
16,581+1556%
Architecture
Fermi
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
240
2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.432 TFLOPS
21.75 TFLOPS+4935%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
40
128+220%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro 3000M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 3000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro 3000M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
8 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 75% difference. The Quadro 3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 3000M) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
TDP
75W-55%
165W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
13.3
100.5+656%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro 3000MRadeon RX 7600
MSRP
$269
Avg Price (30d)
$250
Codename
GF104
Navi 33
Release
February 22 2011
May 24 2023
Ranking
#888
#118