Radeon R7 M380
VS
Radeon R9 M275X

Radeon R7 M380 vs Radeon R9 M275X

AMD

Radeon R7 M380

2015Core: 900 MHzBoost: 915 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M380 is positioned at rank 452 and the Radeon R9 M275X is on rank 460, so the Radeon R7 M380 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M380

#440
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1953%
#442
1770%
#443
1765%
#447
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1605%
#448
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1594%
#450
GeForce 820A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
100%
#451
Radeon HD 7650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
100%
#452
Radeon R7 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#453
100%
#454
Radeon HD 7850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
99%
#455
99%
#456
99%
#457
Radeon HD 8450G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#458
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#459
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
98%
#460
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
98%
#461
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
97%
#462
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
97%
#463
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
96%
#464
96%
#465
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X

#450
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1996%
#452
1809%
#453
1804%
#457
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1641%
#458
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1630%
#460
Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#461
GeForce 8400 GS
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Mobility Radeon HD 550v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#463
Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#464
Radeon R7 M340
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
99%
#465
Qualcomm Adreno 690 GPU
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
99%
#466
98%
#467
Radeon HD 8550G + 8570M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#468
Radeon R5 M230
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
98%
#469
Radeon HD 8650G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#470
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#471
Radeon R9 M370X
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
96%
#472
Radeon HD 8280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#473
GeForce GTX 850A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#474
94%
#475
Mobility Radeon HD 5730
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X.

InsightRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M380 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M380 holds the technical lead. Priced at $300 (vs $300), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M380 and Radeon R9 M275X

AMD

Radeon R7 M380

The Radeon R7 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275X

The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M380 scores 1,669 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M380 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 M380) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M380) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X). Boost clocks: 915 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
G3D Mark Score
1,669+2%
1,631
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.171 TFLOPS
1.184 TFLOPS+1%
Boost Clock
915 MHz
925 MHz+1%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
160 KB
160 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R7 M380) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12_0
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M380) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 4.2.

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
Encoder
VCE 2.0
VCE 2.0
Decoder
UVD 4.2
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M380 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M380) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
Mobile
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
22.3+3%
21.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R9 M275X launched at $300 and now averages $300. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.6 (Radeon R7 M380) vs 5.4 (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Radeon R7 M380 offers 3.7% better value. The Radeon R7 M380 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R7 M380Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP
$300
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$300
Performance per Dollar
5.6+4%
5.4
Codename
Tropo
Venus
Release
May 5 2015
January 28 2014
Ranking
#737
#746