
Radeon R7 M380 vs Radeon R9 M375X

Radeon R7 M380
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M375X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M380 is positioned at rank 452 and the Radeon R9 M375X is on rank 422, so the Radeon R9 M375X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M380
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M375X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M375X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M380.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 M375X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M375X holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $300), it costs 83% less, resulting in a 515.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+515.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M380 and Radeon R9 M375X

Radeon R7 M380
The Radeon R7 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 915 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,669 points.

Radeon R9 M375X
The Radeon R9 M375X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1015 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,711 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M380 scores 1,669 and the Radeon R9 M375X reaches 1,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M380 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 M375X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R7 M380) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M375X). Raw compute: 1.171 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M380) vs 1.299 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M375X). Boost clocks: 915 MHz vs 1015 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,669 | 1,711+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.171 TFLOPS | 1.299 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1015 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 M380 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M375X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M375X offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 80 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M380 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M375X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M375X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M380) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M375X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 22.3 | 22.8+2% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M380 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon R9 M375X launched at $250 and now averages $50. The Radeon R9 M375X costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.6 (Radeon R7 M380) vs 34.2 (Radeon R9 M375X) — the Radeon R9 M375X offers 510.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M380 | Radeon R9 M375X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300 | $250-17% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $50-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 34.2+511% |
| Codename | Tropo | Tropo |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #737 | #727 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















