Radeon R7 M465 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 M465

2016Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1125 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Radeon R7 M465

1,059

0.0%

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7700M Dual

7,869

+643.1%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M465 is positioned at rank #384 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465

#374

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1230%

#376

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1115%

#377

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1112%

#381

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1011%

#382

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1004%

#384

Radeon R7 M465

MSRP: $120|Avg: $35

100%

#386

GeForce GT 640M LE

MSRP: $80|Avg: $20

99%

#387

Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#388

GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

98%

#389

HD Graphics 520

MSRP: $100|Avg: $35

98%

#390

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

97%

#391

Radeon R9 M395X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $150

97%

#393

Radeon R9 M485X

MSRP: $450|Avg: $150

96%

#394

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

95%

#395

Radeon HD 6650A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

95%

#396

GeForce 920A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

94%

#397

GeForce 930A

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

94%

#398

Mobility Radeon HD 4650

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M465 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 643.1% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M465.

Insight	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-643.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+643.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $35), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 246.8% better value per dollar than the Radeon R7 M465.

Insight	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+246.8%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($35)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 M465 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon R7 M465

The Radeon R7 M465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon R7 M465 scores 1,059 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 643.1%. The Radeon R7 M465 is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1125 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	1,059	7,869+643%
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.864 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+245%
Boost Clock	1125 MHz	1665 MHz+48%
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	56+133%
L1 Cache	96 KB	896 KB+833%
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M465 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.13 MB (Radeon R7 M465) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M465) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M465) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCE 3.1	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	UVD 6.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Mobile	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	14.1	104.9+644%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465 launched at $120 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon R7 M465 costs 53.3% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.3 (Radeon R7 M465) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 246.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).