Radeon R7 M465X
VS
FirePro M6000

Radeon R7 M465X vs FirePro M6000

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS

FirePro M6000

2012Core: 800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465X is positioned at rank 342 and the FirePro M6000 is on rank 193, so the FirePro M6000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465X

#332
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
912%
#334
826%
#335
824%
#339
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
749%
#340
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
744%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
95%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#350
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#351
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
92%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro M6000

#84
Radeon PRO V710
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $2000
99%
#85
RTX A5500
MSRP: $3600|Avg: $2200
97%
#86
Radeon Pro WX 9100
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $550
92%
#87
A10G
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2000
90%
#88
Tesla T4
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $1000
89%
#89
Tesla M40 24GB
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $120
88%
#178
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2434%
#193
FirePro M6000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
100%
#196
FirePro M4170
MSRP: $200|Avg: $80
96%
#197
GRID K140Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $500
96%
#200
Radeon Pro Duo
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $799
91%
#201
P102-100
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
91%
#203
Quadro FX 2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
#206
FirePro V3900
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
87%
#207
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700B
MSRP: $119|Avg: $89
87%
#208
Tesla K8
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro M6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M465X.

InsightRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R7 M465X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M465X holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $50), it costs 10% less, resulting in a 9.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+9.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($45)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465X and FirePro M6000

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

AMD

FirePro M6000

The FirePro M6000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,820 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465X scores 1,787 and the FirePro M6000 reaches 1,820 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465X is built on GCN 1.0 while the FirePro M6000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 640 (FirePro M6000). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M6000).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
G3D Mark Score
1,787
1,820+2%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
1.024 TFLOPS+8%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M465X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M6000 has 2 GB. The FirePro M6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 11.1 (FirePro M6000). Vulkan: 1.0 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
DirectX
11.1
11.1
Vulkan
1.0
N/A
OpenGL
4.3
4.6+7%
Max Displays
2
6+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M6000). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (FirePro M6000).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
Encoder
VCE (Early)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465X draws 75W versus the FirePro M6000's 43W — a 54.2% difference. The FirePro M6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 350W (FirePro M6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
TDP
75W
43W-43%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
23.8
42.3+78%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the FirePro M6000 launched at $300 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7 M465X costs 10% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.7 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 36.4 (FirePro M6000) — the Radeon R7 M465X offers 9.1% better value. The Radeon R7 M465X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XFirePro M6000
MSRP
$150-50%
$300
Avg Price (30d)
$45-10%
$50
Performance per Dollar
39.7+9%
36.4
Codename
Tropo
Heathrow
Release
May 15 2016
July 1 2012
Ranking
#715
#710