Radeon R7 M465X vs Iris Plus Graphics 950

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R7 M465X is positioned at rank #342 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465X

#332

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

912%

#334

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

826%

#335

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

824%

#339

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

749%

#340

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

744%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

100%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

98%

#348

GeForce MX350

MSRP: $250|Avg: $200

95%

#349

GeForce 840A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

94%

#350

HD Graphics 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

93%

#351

Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

93%

#354

Radeon R7 M370

MSRP: $130|Avg: $40

92%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R7 M465X is significantly newer (2016 vs 0). The Radeon R7 M465X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M465X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021) (10nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Iris Plus Graphics 950 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R7 M465X Benchmark Check

Iris Plus Graphics 950 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465X and Iris Plus Graphics 950

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

Iris Plus Graphics 950

The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in sem dados. It features the Generation 11.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,789 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465X scores 1,787 and the Iris Plus Graphics 950 reaches 1,789 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465X is built on GCN 1.0 while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 uses Generation 11.0, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 512 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
G3D Mark Score	1,787	1,789
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Generation 11.0
Process Node	28 nm	10 nm
Shading Units	512	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS	1.024 TFLOPS+8%
Boost Clock	925 MHz	1000 MHz+8%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32	32

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M465X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 has 0 MB. The Radeon R7 M465X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 12 (12_1) (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
DirectX	11.1	12 (12_1)+8%
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE (Early) (Radeon R7 M465X) vs Quick Sync 7 (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Decoder: UVD vs Quick Sync 7. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (Iris Plus Graphics 950).

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
Encoder	VCE (Early)	Quick Sync 7
Decoder	UVD	Quick Sync 7
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465X draws 75W versus the Iris Plus Graphics 950's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 1W (Iris Plus Graphics 950). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon R7 M465X	Iris Plus Graphics 950
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	Mobile	Integrated
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	23.8	119.3+401%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the Iris Plus Graphics 950 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Iris Plus Graphics 950 costs 100+% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.7 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs Infinity (Iris Plus Graphics 950) — the Iris Plus Graphics 950 offers Infinity% better value.