
Radeon R7 M465X vs GRID M60-0B

Radeon R7 M465X
Popular choices:

GRID M60-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465X is positioned at rank 342 and the GRID M60-0B is on rank 417, so the Radeon R7 M465X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465X
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M465X.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 M465X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 M465X holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $19,900), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 42895.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+42895.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($19,900) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465X and GRID M60-0B

Radeon R7 M465X
The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

GRID M60-0B
The GRID M60-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 M465X scores 1,787 and the GRID M60-0B reaches 1,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID M60-0B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0B). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-0B). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,787 | 1,838+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9472 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+409% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 1178 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 768 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-0B) — the GRID M60-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 M465X draws 75W versus the GRID M60-0B's 225W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R7 M465X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 350W (GRID M60-0B). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 23.8+190% | 8.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 M465X launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GRID M60-0B launched at $19900 and now averages $19900. The Radeon R7 M465X costs 99.8% less ($19855 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.7 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 0.1 (GRID M60-0B) — the Radeon R7 M465X offers 39600% better value. The Radeon R7 M465X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R7 M465X | GRID M60-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-99% | $19900 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-100% | $19900 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.7+39600% | 0.1 |
| Codename | Tropo | GM204 |
| Release | May 15 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #715 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















