Radeon R7 M465X
VS
GeForce GTX 760M

Radeon R7 M465X vs GeForce GTX 760M

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

2013Core: 657 MHzBoost: 657 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 M465X is positioned at rank 342 and the GeForce GTX 760M is on rank 97, so the GeForce GTX 760M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M465X

#332
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
912%
#334
826%
#335
824%
#339
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
749%
#340
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
744%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
100%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
98%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
95%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
93%
#351
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
92%
#357
Radeon 625
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 760M

#28
Radeon RX 6650M XT
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
99%
#30
Radeon 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#31
Radeon RX 8050S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
94%
#87
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
252%
#89
228%
#90
227%
#94
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
207%
#95
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
205%
#97
GeForce GTX 760M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
100%
#100
GeForce 945M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $98
98%
#103
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
96%
#105
GeForce GTX 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
95%
#106
Radeon HD 7470M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $12
95%
#110
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R7 M465X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 760M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 760M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $45), it costs 11% less, resulting in a 8.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+8.7%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 M465X and GeForce GTX 760M

AMD

Radeon R7 M465X

The Radeon R7 M465X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,787 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760M

The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R7 M465X scores 1,787 and the GeForce GTX 760M reaches 1,726 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 M465X is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 760M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 760M). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 657 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
G3D Mark Score
1,787+4%
1,726
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9472 TFLOPS
1.009 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock
925 MHz+41%
657 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
128 KB+100%
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R7 M465X comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 760M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 760M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
80 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R7 M465X draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 760M's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 760M). Power connectors: Mobile vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
23.8
31.4+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 760M costs 11.1% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.7 (Radeon R7 M465X) vs 43.1 (GeForce GTX 760M) — the GeForce GTX 760M offers 8.6% better value. The Radeon R7 M465X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R7 M465XGeForce GTX 760M
MSRP
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$45
$40-11%
Performance per Dollar
39.7
43.1+9%
Codename
Tropo
GK106
Release
May 15 2016
May 30 2013
Ranking
#715
#725