
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs GRID V100D-8Q

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Popular choices:

GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100D-8Q.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $149 (vs $10,000), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 6779.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+6779.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($149) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and GRID V100D-8Q

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 975 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,260+3% | 4,156 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+100% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS+49% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 975 MHz | 1306 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-51% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 220mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.7+109% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $149, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 98.5% less ($9851 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 7050% better value. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-99% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $149-99% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.6+7050% | 0.4 |
| Codename | Trinidad | GM107 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #456 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















