Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20Xm

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20Xm FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20Xm: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $7,550 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4899.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 235W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K20Xm

2012

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5067.1% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌113.6% higher power demand at 235W vs 110W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K20Xm is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.4% in PassMark G3D (4,403 vs 4,260), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,550 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4899.3% (28.6 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K20Xm still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20Xm Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Tesla K20Xm

The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Tesla K20Xm reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20Xm
G3D Mark Score	4,260	4,403+3%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	2688+110%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	3.935 TFLOPS+58%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	80	224+180%
L1 Cache	384 KB+71%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20Xm
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm carries 6 GB. Tesla K20Xm gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20Xm. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the Tesla K20Xm has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20Xm
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	6 GB+200%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.5 MB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 72.5% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20Xm
TDP	110W-53%	235W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	220mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	38.7+107%	18.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 came in at $149, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 98.1% cheaper ($7550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 0.6 (Tesla K20Xm) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 4666.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20Xm
MSRP	$149-98%	$7699
Performance per Dollar	28.6+4667%	0.6
Codename	Trinidad	GK110
Release	May 5 2015	November 12 2012
Ranking	#456	#473

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Search Tesla K20Xm on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.