Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

✅1.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.1 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (4,306 vs 4,260), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 270 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 18.9% (28.6 vs 24.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 270 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 scores 4,306 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	Radeon R9 270	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,306+1%	4,260
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.368 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock	925 MHz	975 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L1 Cache	320 KB	384 KB+20%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 270	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

Feature	Radeon R9 270	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	179.2 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon R9 270	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	150W	110W-27%
Recommended PSU	500W	450W-10%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	—	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	28.7	38.7+35%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 270 came in at $179, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 16.8% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 18.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Radeon R9 270	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	$179	$149-17%
Performance per Dollar	24.1	28.6+19%
Codename	Curacao	Trinidad
Release	November 13 2013	May 5 2015
Ranking	#476	#456

Search Radeon R9 270 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.