Radeon R9 270
VS
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Radeon R9 270 vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

AMD

Radeon R9 270

2013Boost: 925 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370.

InsightRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 270 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $149), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 402% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+402%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($149)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 and Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 scores 4,306 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,306+1%
4,260
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.368 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock
925 MHz
975 MHz+5%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L1 Cache
320 KB
384 KB+20%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 270) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP
150W
110W-27%
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
220mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
28.7
38.7+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270 launched at $179 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The Radeon R9 270 costs 79.9% less ($119 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 143.5 (Radeon R9 270) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 401.7% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon R9 270Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP
$179
$149-17%
Avg Price (30d)
$30-80%
$149
Performance per Dollar
143.5+402%
28.6
Codename
Curacao
Trinidad
Release
November 13 2013
May 5 2015
Ranking
#476
#456