GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 3nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

✅2.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) instead at 4,463 vs 4,306, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 3nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)	Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score	4,463+4%	4,306
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	3 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+180%	1280

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)	Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R9 270. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)	Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+60%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)	Radeon R9 270
TDP	50W-67%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	89.3+211%	28.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) (2025 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)	Radeon R9 270
MSRP	—	$179
Codename	GN22-X2	Curacao
Release	January 2 2025	November 13 2013
Ranking	#não classificado	#476

Search GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.