
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
2025Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 3nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 24.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) better than Radeon R9 270?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 270 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) and Radeon R9 270

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,463 points.

Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) scores 4,463 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on 3 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,463+4% | 4,306 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 3 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+180% | 1280 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 270 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 60% advantage for the Radeon R9 270. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+60% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 89.3+211% | 28.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile) | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $179 |
| Codename | GN22-X2 | Curacao |
| Release | January 2 2025 | November 13 2013 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #476 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













