GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1017.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 986.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P6-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (4,429 vs 4,306), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,821 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 986.3% (24.1 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P6-4Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score	4,429+3%	4,306
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.368 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	576 KB+80%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 40% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	44.3+54%	28.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 was 91% cheaper ($1821 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 995.5% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270
MSRP	$2000	$179-91%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	24.1+995%
Codename	GM204	Curacao
Release	August 30 2015	November 13 2013
Ranking	#535	#476

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.