Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GRID P6-4Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P6-4Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GRID P6-4Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
3 GB 150
4,415
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
brand logoGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GRID P6-4Q
2 GB 100
4,429
+0.3%
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GRID P6-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 566.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.
  • ❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    568.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P6-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (4,429 vs 4,415), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 566.8% (14.8 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P6-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs GRID P6-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the GRID P6-4Q reaches 4,429 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID P6-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
G3D Mark Score
4,415
4,429
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
1536+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS+19%
2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
112+17%
96
L1 Cache
112 KB
576 KB+414%
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P6-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P6-4Q carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.38 MB
2 MB+426%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the GRID P6-4Q's 100W — a 40% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 350W (GRID P6-4Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
TDP
150W
100W-33%
Recommended PSU
450W
350W-22%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
1mm
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
97°C
—
Perf/Watt
29.4
44.3+51%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 660 Ti was 85% cheaper ($1701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 572.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiGRID P6-4Q
MSRP
$299-85%
$2000
Performance per Dollar
14.8+573%
2.2
Codename
GK104
GM204
Release
August 16 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#472
#535
Search GeForce GTX 660 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.