
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $51), it costs 71% less, resulting in a 234.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+234.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($51) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon R7 370

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 975 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,415 | 4,482+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+31% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS+32% | 1.997 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 975 MHz |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 256 KB+129% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R7 370) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R7 370. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 144.2 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s+24% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.4 | 44.8+52% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $51. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 70.6% less ($36 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 234.8% better value. The Radeon R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $149-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-71% | $51 |
| Performance per Dollar | 294.3+235% | 87.9 |
| Codename | GK104 | Trinidad |
| Release | August 16 2012 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #472 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















