GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 370

2015Boost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 30.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Radeon R7 370

2015

Why buy it

  • 30.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Delivers 103.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.
  • Measures 221mm instead of 241mm, a 20mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (4,482 vs 4,415), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 103.7% (30.1 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R7 370

The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,415
4,482+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344+31%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS+32%
1.997 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
980 MHz
975 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
112+75%
64
L1 Cache
112 KB
256 KB+129%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 370 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R7 370) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R7 370. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon R7 370. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+24%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 370). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264 (Radeon R7 370).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
TDP
150W
100W-33%
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
221mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
97°C
Perf/Watt
29.4
44.8+52%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R7 370 was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 30.1 (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 103.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R7 370
MSRP
$299
$149-50%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
30.1+103%
Codename
GK104
Trinidad
Release
August 16 2012
June 18 2015
Ranking
#472
#467

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.