GeForce GTX 660 Ti
VS
Radeon R9 270

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270

2013Boost: 925 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 270.

InsightGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 105.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+105.1%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score
4,415+3%
4,306
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344+5%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS+11%
2.368 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
980 MHz+6%
925 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
112+40%
80
L1 Cache
112 KB
320 KB+186%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+24%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
450W-10%
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
97°C
Perf/Watt
29.4+2%
28.7
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 50% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 143.5 (Radeon R9 270) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 105.1% better value. The Radeon R9 270 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270
MSRP
$299
$179-40%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-50%
$30
Performance per Dollar
294.3+105%
143.5
Codename
GK104
Curacao
Release
August 16 2012
November 13 2013
Ranking
#472
#476