GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

✅35.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 35.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 660 Ti instead at 4,415 vs 4,306, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $120 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 62.9% (24.1 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score	4,415+3%	4,306
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+5%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS+11%	2.368 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	980 MHz+6%	925 MHz
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	112 KB	320 KB+186%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity	3 GB+50%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	144.2 GB/s	179.2 GB/s+24%
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	384 KB	512 KB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon R9 270
TDP	150W	150W
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	97°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.4+2%	28.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 was 40.1% cheaper ($120 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 62.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon R9 270
MSRP	$299	$179-40%
Performance per Dollar	14.8	24.1+63%
Codename	GK104	Curacao
Release	August 16 2012	November 13 2013
Ranking	#472	#476

Search GeForce GTX 660 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.