
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro P1000

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 660 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $80), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 423.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+423.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro P1000

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro P1000
The Quadro P1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1519 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $375.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Quadro P1000 reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Quadro P1000 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 640 (Quadro P1000). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1.555 TFLOPS (Quadro P1000). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1519 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,415 | 4,495+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+110% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS+69% | 1.555 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1519 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+250% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 192 KB+71% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P1000 has 4 GB. The Quadro P1000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro P1000) — the Quadro P1000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro P1000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P1000). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P1000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 6th Gen NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Quadro P1000's 40W — a 115.8% difference. The Quadro P1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro P1000). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 40W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 145mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 70°C-28% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.4 | 112.4+282% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro P1000 launched at $0 and now averages $80. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 81.3% less ($65 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 56.2 (Quadro P1000) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 423.7% better value. The Quadro P1000 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro P1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-81% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 294.3+424% | 56.2 |
| Codename | GK104 | GP107 |
| Release | August 16 2012 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #472 | #466 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















