
GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅116.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,415 | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 4096 ×2+205% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+367% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1500 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64 ×2+167% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256 ×2+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.11 MB | 1 MB+809% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 4 MB+953% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 4 MB+953% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.4+100% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 16 2012 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #472 | #474 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














