
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is significantly newer (2018 vs 2012). The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1011 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,415 | 4,498+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+5% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS+2% | 2.588 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1011 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 320 KB+186% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 65W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 29.4 | 69.2+135% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 294.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | August 16 2012 | April 24 2018 |
| Ranking | #472 | #464 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















