GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (4,498 vs 4,415), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,415	4,498+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1344+5%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS+2%	2.588 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1011 MHz+3%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	112+40%	80
L1 Cache	112 KB	320 KB+186%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs Integrated.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP	150W	65W-57%
Recommended PSU	450W	1W-100%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	Integrated
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	97°C	—
Perf/Watt	29.4	69.2+135%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
MSRP	$299	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	14.8	Infinity
Codename	GK104	Polaris 22
Release	August 16 2012	April 24 2018
Ranking	#472	#464

Search GeForce GTX 660 Ti on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.