GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank 280 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is on rank 24, so the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P6-4Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4096 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+454% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 96 | 256 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 1 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 100% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3+201% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #535 | #474 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P6-4Q and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
