GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
✅Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P6-4Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (4,498 vs 4,429), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P6-4Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,498 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL reaches 4,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score	4,429	4,498+2%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.588 TFLOPS+17%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	576 KB+80%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. GRID P6-4Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL's 65W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1W (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
TDP	100W	65W-35%
Recommended PSU	350W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	44.3	69.2+56%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL was 100+% cheaper ($2000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL) — the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
MSRP	$2000	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	Infinity
Codename	GM204	Polaris 22
Release	August 30 2015	April 24 2018
Ranking	#535	#464

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.