GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20m
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Tesla K20m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank 280 and the Tesla K20m is on rank 1, so the Tesla K20m offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20m
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K20m is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K20m offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla K20m holds the technical lead. Priced at $55 (vs $150), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 172.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+172.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and Tesla K20m
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2496+63% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 96 | 208+117% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+177% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3+125% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199 and now averages $55. The Tesla K20m costs 63.3% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 80.6 (Tesla K20m) — the Tesla K20m offers 173.2% better value. The GRID P6-4Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-37% | $3199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $55-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 80.6+173% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK110 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #535 | #470 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P6-4Q and Tesla K20m
