GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20m

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20m FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K20m

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
60% HIGHER MSRP
$3,199 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K20m is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (4,432 vs 4,429), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P6-4Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,199 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $3,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.8% (2.2 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K20m still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Tesla K20m

The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K20m
G3D Mark Score	4,429	4,432
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2496+63%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	3.524 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs	64+60%	40
TMUs	96	208+117%
L1 Cache	576 KB+177%	208 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K20m
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K20m
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K20m
TDP	100W-56%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	44.3+125%	19.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. On MSRP, GRID P6-4Q was 37.5% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the GRID P6-4Q offers 57.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K20m
MSRP	$2000-37%	$3199
Performance per Dollar	2.2+57%	1.4
Codename	GM204	GK110
Release	August 30 2015	January 5 2013
Ranking	#535	#470

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Tesla K20m on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.