
GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R7 370

GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon R7 370
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank #280 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-4Q.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7 370 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7 370 holds the technical lead. Priced at $51 (vs $150), it costs 66% less, resulting in a 197.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+197.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($51) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and Radeon R7 370

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Radeon R7 370
The Radeon R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,482 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon R7 370 reaches 4,482 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 370). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 370).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,482+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+11% | 1.997 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R7 370) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (Radeon R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 370's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 450W (Radeon R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 221mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 221mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3 | 44.8+1% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon R7 370 launched at $149 and now averages $51. The Radeon R7 370 costs 66% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 87.9 (Radeon R7 370) — the Radeon R7 370 offers 198% better value.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon R7 370 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $149-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $51-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 87.9+198% |
| Codename | GM204 | Trinidad |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #535 | #467 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













