GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c

GRID P6-4Q

2015Core: 722 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

2012Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 60% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,199 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
  • 26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Tesla K20c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (4,432 vs 4,429), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P6-4Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,199 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $3,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 59.8% (2.2 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K20c still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
G3D Mark Score
4,429
4,432
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2496+63%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.218 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs
64+60%
40
TMUs
96
208+117%
L1 Cache
576 KB+177%
208 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
DirectX
12_1+9%
11_0
Max Displays
0
0
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
TDP
100W-56%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
267mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Perf/Watt
44.3+125%
19.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, GRID P6-4Q was 37.5% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the GRID P6-4Q offers 57.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGRID P6-4QTesla K20c
MSRP
$2000-37%
$3199
Performance per Dollar
2.2+57%
1.4
Codename
GM204
GK110
Release
August 30 2015
November 12 2012
Ranking
#535
#549

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.