
GRID P6-4Q

Tesla K20c
GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,199 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla K20c
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌60% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.
- ❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Tesla K20c
The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2496+63% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 96 | 208+117% |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+177% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+60% | 1.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3+125% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, GRID P6-4Q was 37.5% cheaper ($1199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the GRID P6-4Q offers 57.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-37% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2+57% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GM204 | GK110 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #535 | #549 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















