GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K40c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,699 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 279.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 245W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 267mm, a 266mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
284.9% HIGHER MSRP
$7,699 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
❌145% higher power demand at 245W vs 100W.
❌26600% longer card at 267mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K40c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (4,495 vs 4,429), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P6-4Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,699 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $7,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 279.3% (2.2 vs 0.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K40c still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID P6-4Q vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	4,429	4,495+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536	2880+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+128%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	96	240+150%
L1 Cache	576 KB+140%	240 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12_1+9%	11_0
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 84.1% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
TDP	100W-59%	245W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	44.3+142%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, GRID P6-4Q was 74% cheaper ($5699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GRID P6-4Q offers 266.7% better value. The newer card here is GRID P6-4Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Tesla K40c
MSRP	$2000-74%	$7699
Performance per Dollar	2.2+267%	0.6
Codename	GM204	GK180
Release	August 30 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#535	#465

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Tesla K40c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.