
Quadro M2200

Radeon R9 270
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌179.3% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon R9 270
2013Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 180.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Radeon R9 270
The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294 | 4,306 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS | 2.368 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1036 MHz+12% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 carries 2 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-63% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+172% | 28.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 was 64.2% cheaper ($321 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 180.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $179-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6 | 24.1+180% |
| Codename | GM206 | Curacao |
| Release | January 11 2017 | November 13 2013 |
| Ranking | #479 | #476 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














