Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270

2013Boost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 179.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

  • 1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $321 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 180.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 270 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (4,306 vs 4,294), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $321 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 180.1% (24.1 vs 8.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M2200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M2200 vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score
4,294
4,306
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.122 TFLOPS
2.368 TFLOPS+12%
Boost Clock
1036 MHz+12%
925 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L1 Cache
384 KB+20%
320 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 carries 2 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon R9 270
TDP
55W-63%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
78.1+172%
28.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 was 64.2% cheaper ($321 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 180.2% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon R9 270
MSRP
$500
$179-64%
Performance per Dollar
8.6
24.1+180%
Codename
GM206
Curacao
Release
January 11 2017
November 13 2013
Ranking
#479
#476

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.