Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 519.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
539.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K20c is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (4,432 vs 4,294), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,699 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $3,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 519.9% (8.6 vs 1.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla K20c still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
G3D Mark Score	4,294	4,432+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2496+144%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.122 TFLOPS	3.524 TFLOPS+66%
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	64	208+225%
L1 Cache	384 KB+85%	208 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20c carries 2 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
DirectX	12 (12_1)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
TDP	55W-76%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	78.1+296%	19.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, Quadro M2200 was 84.4% cheaper ($2699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the Quadro M2200 offers 514.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro M2200	Tesla K20c
MSRP	$500-84%	$3199
Performance per Dollar	8.6+514%	1.4
Codename	GM206	GK110
Release	January 11 2017	November 12 2012
Ranking	#479	#549

Search Quadro M2200 on Amazon

Search Tesla K20c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.