GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro M2200
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Popular choices:
Quadro M2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $70), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 379.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+379.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M2200
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1036 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,415+3% | 4,294 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+31% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS+24% | 2.122 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1036 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 24 | 32+33% |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 384 KB+243% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs 2nd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | 2nd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 55W-63% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 97°C | 80°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 29.4 | 78.1+166% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500 and now averages $70. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 78.6% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 61.3 (Quadro M2200) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 380.1% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 660 Ti | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-79% | $70 |
| Performance per Dollar | 294.3+380% | 61.3 |
| Codename | GK104 | GM206 |
| Release | August 16 2012 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #472 | #479 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 660 Ti and Quadro M2200
