G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 71.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.8 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M2200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

✅34.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
67.2% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M2200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 660 Ti instead at 4,415 vs 4,294, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 660 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $201 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 71.9% (14.8 vs 8.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M2200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1036 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
G3D Mark Score	4,415+3%	4,294
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344+31%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS+24%	2.122 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1036 MHz+6%
ROPs	24	32+33%
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	112 KB	384 KB+243%
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.38 MB	1 MB+163%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.3	4.6+7%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs 2nd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	2nd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	97°C	80°C-18%
Perf/Watt	29.4	78.1+166%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 660 Ti was 40.2% cheaper ($201 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 72.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 660 Ti	Quadro M2200
MSRP	$299-40%	$500
Performance per Dollar	14.8+72%	8.6
Codename	GK104	GM206
Release	August 16 2012	January 11 2017
Ranking	#472	#479

Search GeForce GTX 660 Ti on Amazon

Search Quadro M2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.