GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro M2200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1900% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1966.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M2200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (4,294 vs 4,156), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID V100D-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9,500 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1966.4% (8.6 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID V100D-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1036 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro M2200
G3D Mark Score	4,156	4,294+3%
Architecture	Maxwell	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	2.122 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+26%	1036 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB	384 KB+20%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro M2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro M2200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro M2200
TDP	225W	55W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	18.5	78.1+322%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100D-8Q came in at $10000, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro M2200 was 95% cheaper ($9500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 offers 2050% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Quadro M2200
MSRP	$10000	$500-95%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	8.6+2050%
Codename	GM107	GM206
Release	May 18 2016	January 11 2017
Ranking	#622	#479

Search GRID V100D-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro M2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.