
GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K4200

GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:

Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID V100D-8Q is positioned at rank #387 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K4200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100D-8Q.
| Insight | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K4200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K4200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $10,000), it costs 100% less, resulting in a 20747% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20747%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100D-8Q and Quadro K4200

GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro K4200 reaches 4,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 784 MHz.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,156 | 4,332+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1344+110% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 2.107 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz+67% | 784 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+186% | 112 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID V100D-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4200 has 4 GB. The Quadro K4200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 108W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 40.1+117% |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 MSRP and currently averages $10000, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro K4200 costs 99.5% less ($9950 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 86.6 (Quadro K4200) — the Quadro K4200 offers 21550% better value. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000 | $50-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.4 | 86.6+21550% |
| Codename | GM107 | GK104 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #622 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















