GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K4200

GRID V100D-8Q

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

2014Core: 771 MHzBoost: 784 MHz

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K4200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 108.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 108W.

Quadro K4200

2014

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 108W instead of 225W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K4200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (4,332 vs 4,156), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID V100D-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID V100D-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K4200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Quadro K4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K4200

The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Quadro K4200 reaches 4,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 784 MHz.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K4200
G3D Mark Score
4,156
4,332+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
1344+110%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.672 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
1306 MHz+67%
784 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
112+180%
L1 Cache
320 KB+186%
112 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K4200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K4200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro K4200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K4200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 70.3% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K4200
TDP
225W
108W-52%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
18.5
40.1+117%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100D-8Q came in at $10000, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro K4200 was 100+% cheaper ($10000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs Infinity (Quadro K4200) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100D-8Q (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGRID V100D-8QQuadro K4200
MSRP
$10000
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.4
Infinity
Codename
GM107
GK104
Release
May 18 2016
July 22 2014
Ranking
#622
#475

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.