CPU
GPU
GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Tesla K20Xm
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID V100D-8Q is positioned at rank 387 and the Tesla K20Xm is on rank 100, so the Tesla K20Xm offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K20Xm
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla K20Xm is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100D-8Q.
| Insight | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla K20Xm offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla K20Xm holds the technical lead. Priced at $7,699 (vs $10,000), it costs 23% less, resulting in a 37.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+37.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) | ✅More affordable ($7,699) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100D-8Q and Tesla K20Xm
GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Tesla K20Xm
The Tesla K20Xm is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 versus the Tesla K20Xm's 4,403 — the Tesla K20Xm leads by 5.9%. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Tesla K20Xm uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2,688 (Tesla K20Xm). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (Tesla K20Xm).
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,156 | 4,403+6% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2688+320% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.672 TFLOPS | 3.935 TFLOPS+135% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 224+460% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+43% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID V100D-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20Xm has 6 GB. The Tesla K20Xm offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K20Xm) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Tesla K20Xm's 235W — a 4.3% difference. The GRID V100D-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 350W (Tesla K20Xm). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-4% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5 | 18.7+1% |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 MSRP and currently averages $10000, while the Tesla K20Xm launched at $7699. The GRID V100D-8Q is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).
| Feature | GRID V100D-8Q | Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | $7699-23% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10000 | — |
| Codename | GM107 | GK110 |
| Release | May 18 2016 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #622 | #473 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID V100D-8Q and Tesla K20Xm
