GRID V100D-8Q vs Radeon R9 270

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Radeon R9 270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Radeon R9 270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100D-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5486.6% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 24.1 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Radeon R9 270

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,821 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5688.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 24.1 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 270 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (4,306 vs 4,156), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID V100D-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9,821 cheaper on MSRP at $179 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5688.2% (24.1 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID V100D-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100D-8Q vs Radeon R9 270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100D-8Q

The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.

Radeon R9 270

The Radeon R9 270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,306 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100D-8Q scores 4,156 and the Radeon R9 270 reaches 4,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100D-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 270 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 2.368 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Radeon R9 270
G3D Mark Score	4,156	4,306+4%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	1280+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	2.368 TFLOPS+42%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+41%	925 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	80+100%
L1 Cache	320 KB	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Radeon R9 270
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100D-8Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Radeon R9 270
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100D-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 270's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon R9 270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 500W (Radeon R9 270). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Radeon R9 270
TDP	225W	150W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	18.5	28.7+55%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100D-8Q came in at $10000, while the Radeon R9 270 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 was 98.2% cheaper ($9821 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) vs 24.1 (Radeon R9 270) — the Radeon R9 270 offers 5925% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100D-8Q (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID V100D-8Q	Radeon R9 270
MSRP	$10000	$179-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	24.1+5925%
Codename	GM107	Curacao
Release	May 18 2016	November 13 2013
Ranking	#622	#476

Search GRID V100D-8Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.