GRID P6-4Q vs Quadro M2200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Quadro M2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Quadro M2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
300% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
❌81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 287.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P6-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (4,429 vs 4,294), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro M2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,500 cheaper on MSRP at $500 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 287.8% (8.6 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M2200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P6-4Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P6-4Q vs Quadro M2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
G3D Mark Score	4,429+3%	4,294
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS+5%	2.122 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	576 KB+50%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P6-4Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 64-bit on the Quadro M2200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
DirectX	12_1	12 (12_1)
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
TDP	100W	55W-45%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	44.3	78.1+76%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, Quadro M2200 was 75% cheaper ($1500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 8.6 (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 offers 290.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Quadro M2200
MSRP	$2000	$500-75%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	8.6+291%
Codename	GM204	GM206
Release	August 30 2015	January 11 2017
Ranking	#535	#479

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Quadro M2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.