GRID P6-4Q vs Quadro M2200
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:
Quadro M2200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID P6-4Q is positioned at rank 280 and the Quadro M2200 is on rank 158, so the Quadro M2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-4Q
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $150), it costs 53% less, resulting in a 107.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+107.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($70) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and Quadro M2200
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Quadro M2200 reaches 4,294 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M2200 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,024 (Quadro M2200). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429+3% | 4,294 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS+5% | 2.122 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+50% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-4Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2200 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2200) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Quadro M2200's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Quadro M2200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 55W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3 | 78.1+76% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-4Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro M2200 launched at $500 and now averages $70. The Quadro M2200 costs 53.3% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 29.5 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 61.3 (Quadro M2200) — the Quadro M2200 offers 107.8% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Quadro M2200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $500-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $70-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.5 | 61.3+108% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM206 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #535 | #479 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID P6-4Q and Quadro M2200
