Quadro M2200
Tesla K20m
Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20m Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20m FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,699 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 519.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌539.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M2200 vs Tesla K20m Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Tesla K20m reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294 | 4,432+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2496+144% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+66% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 64 | 208+225% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+85% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m carries 2 GB. Quadro M2200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2200 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20m. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the Tesla K20m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-76% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+296% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M2200 came in at $500, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. On MSRP, Quadro M2200 was 84.4% cheaper ($2699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (Quadro M2200) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the Quadro M2200 offers 514.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M2200 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-84% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+514% | 1.4 |
| Codename | GM206 | GK110 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #479 | #470 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2200 and Tesla K20m
