CPU
GPU
Quadro M2200
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M2200 is positioned at rank 158 and the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is on rank 103, so the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 460 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $70), it costs 36% less, resulting in a 48.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+48.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) reaches 4,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1180 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294+5% | 4,100 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+14% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS | 2.115 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1036 MHz | 1180 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+14% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+71% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has 2 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Decoder: 2nd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | 2nd Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+5% | 74.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99 and now averages $45. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) costs 35.7% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.3 (Quadro M2200) vs 91.1 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 48.6% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon RX 460 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $99-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70 | $45-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.3 | 91.1+49% |
| Codename | GM206 | Baffin |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #479 | #499 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2200 and Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
