Quadro M2200 vs GRID V100D-8Q
Quadro M2200
Popular choices:
GRID V100D-8Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M2200 is positioned at rank 158 and the GRID V100D-8Q is on rank 387, so the Quadro M2200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100D-8Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M2200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100D-8Q.
| Insight | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M2200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $70 (vs $10,000), it costs 99% less, resulting in a 14660.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14660.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($70) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and GRID V100D-8Q
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.
GRID V100D-8Q
The GRID V100D-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,156 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the GRID V100D-8Q reaches 4,156 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID V100D-8Q uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 640 (GRID V100D-8Q). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100D-8Q). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294+3% | 4,156 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+60% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS+27% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1036 MHz | 1306 MHz+26% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+60% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID V100D-8Q has 2 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 2 MB (GRID V100D-8Q) — the GRID V100D-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the GRID V100D-8Q's 225W — a 121.4% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (GRID V100D-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-76% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+322% | 18.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M2200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the GRID V100D-8Q launched at $10000 and now averages $10000. The Quadro M2200 costs 99.3% less ($9930 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.3 (Quadro M2200) vs 0.4 (GRID V100D-8Q) — the Quadro M2200 offers 15225% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | GRID V100D-8Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-95% | $10000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $70-99% | $10000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.3+15225% | 0.4 |
| Codename | GM206 | GM107 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #479 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M2200 and GRID V100D-8Q
