Quadro M2200 vs GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro M2200

4,294

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

4,415

+2.8%

GeForce GT 1030

GeForce GTX 675MX

GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX TITAN Z

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M2200 is positioned at rank #158 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2200

#74

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $4095

88%

#75

Radeon Pro Vega II

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800

83%

#76

Radeon PRO W7900

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500

82%

#143

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1720%

#158

Quadro M2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $70

100%

#159

Quadro M4000

MSRP: $791|Avg: $350

98%

#160

FirePro W4100

MSRP: $183|Avg: $183

95%

#166

FirePro W5100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $50

87%

#167

Radeon Pro WX 4170

MSRP: $400|Avg: $120

84%

#168

FirePro W4300

MSRP: $379|Avg: $50

83%

#169

Quadro K2200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $40

83%

#173

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

MSRP: $119|Avg: $86

82%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M2200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $70), it costs 79% less, resulting in a 379.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+379.8%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($70)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M2200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 660 Ti Benchmark Check

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the GeForce GTX 660 Ti reaches 4,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 980 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
G3D Mark Score	4,294	4,415+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1344+31%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.122 TFLOPS	2.634 TFLOPS+24%
Boost Clock	1036 MHz+6%	980 MHz
ROPs	32+33%	24
TMUs	64	112+75%
L1 Cache	384 KB+243%	112 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the Quadro M2200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+33%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB+163%	0.38 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M2200) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (FL 11_0)
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2200) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Decoder: 2nd Gen NVDEC vs PureVideo VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti).

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	2nd Gen NVDEC	PureVideo VP5
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the GeForce GTX 660 Ti's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 97°C.

Feature	Quadro M2200	GeForce GTX 660 Ti
TDP	55W-63%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	—	241mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-18%	97°C
Perf/Watt	78.1+166%	29.4

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M2200 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $70, while the GeForce GTX 660 Ti launched at $299 and now averages $15. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti costs 78.6% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.3 (Quadro M2200) vs 294.3 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 660 Ti offers 380.1% better value. The Quadro M2200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).