GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 220mm, a 219mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1191.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌21900% longer card at 220mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P6-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4% in PassMark G3D (4,429 vs 4,260), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID P6-4Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1191.1% (28.6 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P6-4Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P6-4Q vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-4Q

The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score	4,429+4%	4,260
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.218 TFLOPS	2.496 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L1 Cache	576 KB+50%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-4Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the GRID P6-4Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX	12_1	12 (11_1)
Max Displays	0	4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 9.5% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 220mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP	100W-9%	110W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	220mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70
Perf/Watt	44.3+14%	38.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-4Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 92.5% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 1200% better value.

Feature	GRID P6-4Q	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP	$2000	$149-93%
Performance per Dollar	2.2	28.6+1200%
Codename	GM204	Trinidad
Release	August 30 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#535	#456

Search GRID P6-4Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.