Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1963.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
✅Measures 220mm instead of 267mm, a 47mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
2047% HIGHER MSRP
$3,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
❌21.4% longer card at 267mm vs 220mm.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Tesla K20c

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1963.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
✅Measures 220mm instead of 267mm, a 47mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
2047% HIGHER MSRP
$3,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
❌21.4% longer card at 267mm vs 220mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Tesla K20c better than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,260 vs 4,432 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Tesla K20c is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2012 and better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Tesla K20c is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Tesla K20c is about 2047.0% more expensive on MSRP at $3,199 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 4.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 make more sense than Tesla K20c?

Yes. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (110W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Tesla K20c. The trade-off is that Tesla K20c currently gives you 4.0% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Benchmark Check

Tesla K20c Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
1080p
low	77 FPS	102 FPS
medium	62 FPS	83 FPS
high	49 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	39 FPS
1440p
low	65 FPS	85 FPS
medium	53 FPS	71 FPS
high	37 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	29 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	28 FPS
medium	22 FPS	26 FPS
high	14 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	15 FPS

Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Open Tesla K20c

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
1080p
low	111 FPS	88 FPS
medium	82 FPS	62 FPS
high	63 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	63 FPS	49 FPS
medium	42 FPS	32 FPS
high	31 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	18 FPS
medium	15 FPS	12 FPS
high	12 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	8 FPS	7 FPS

Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Open Tesla K20c

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
1080p
low	192 FPS	199 FPS
medium	153 FPS	160 FPS
high	128 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	144 FPS	150 FPS
medium	115 FPS	120 FPS
high	96 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	100 FPS
medium	77 FPS	80 FPS
high	64 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	50 FPS

Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Open Tesla K20c

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
1080p
low	135 FPS	182 FPS
medium	108 FPS	146 FPS
high	94 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	99 FPS	127 FPS
medium	81 FPS	104 FPS
high	71 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	66 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	74 FPS
medium	44 FPS	57 FPS
high	35 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	31 FPS

Open Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Open Tesla K20c

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and Tesla K20c

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Tesla K20c

The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
G3D Mark Score	4,260	4,432+4%
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280	2496+95%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.496 TFLOPS	3.524 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	80	208+160%
L1 Cache	384 KB+85%	208 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.25 MB+150%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1.25 MB+150%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
DirectX	12 (11_1)+9%	11_0
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 220mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon R9 270 / R7 370	Tesla K20c
TDP	110W-51%	225W
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	220mm	267mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70	—
Perf/Watt	38.7+96%	19.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 costs 95.3% less ($3050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 1942.9% better value. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).