
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

Tesla K20c
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20c Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20c FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,050 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1963.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 225W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Measures 220mm instead of 267mm, a 47mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla K20c
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2047% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.4 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($3,199 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌104.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 110W.
- ❌21.4% longer card at 267mm vs 220mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 vs Tesla K20c Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

Tesla K20c
The Tesla K20c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 12 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 scores 4,260 and the Tesla K20c reaches 4,432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Tesla K20c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20c). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20c).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,260 | 4,432+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2496+95% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 3.524 TFLOPS+41% |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 80 | 208+160% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+85% | 208 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.25 MB+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 and 64-bit on the Tesla K20c. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20c) — the Tesla K20c has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.25 MB+150% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 11_0 (Tesla K20c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_1)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 draws 110W versus the Tesla K20c's 225W — a 68.7% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 350W (Tesla K20c). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 220mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W-51% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 220mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.7+96% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 came in at $149, while the Tesla K20c launched at $3199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 95.3% cheaper ($3050 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20c) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 1942.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 | Tesla K20c |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-95% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.6+1943% | 1.4 |
| Codename | Trinidad | GK110 |
| Release | May 5 2015 | November 12 2012 |
| Ranking | #456 | #549 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














