Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015Core: 925 MHzBoost: 975 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 660 Ti
3 GB 150
4,415
+3.6%
brand logoGeForce GT 1030
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST
brand logoGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
2 GB 110
4,260
0.0%
brand logoRadeon RX 550X
brand logoRadeon HD 6970
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
brand logoRadeon RX 560
brand logoRadeon RX 480
brand logoRadeon RX 6600S
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low36 FPS
medium22 FPS
high15 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low77 FPS
medium62 FPS
high49 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low62 FPS
medium36 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra17 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low111 FPS
medium82 FPS
high63 FPS
ultra38 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low199 FPS
medium159 FPS
high132 FPS
ultra99 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low192 FPS
medium153 FPS
high128 FPS
ultra96 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low107 FPS
medium85 FPS
high66 FPS
ultra50 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low135 FPS
medium108 FPS
high94 FPS
ultra77 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low13 FPS
medium8 FPS
high5 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low67 FPS
medium49 FPS
high33 FPS
ultra20 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low32 FPS
medium25 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra10 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low51 FPS
medium40 FPS
high29 FPS
ultra18 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low53 FPS
medium36 FPS
high27 FPS
ultra20 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low49 FPS
medium34 FPS
high26 FPS
ultra20 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low59 FPS
medium48 FPS
high37 FPS
ultra30 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low77 FPS
medium60 FPS
high51 FPS
ultra37 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
low32 FPS
medium23 FPS
high18 FPS
ultra14 FPS
1080P
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370
low70 FPS
medium55 FPS
high44 FPS
ultra32 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    100.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $299 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.8 vs 28.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌36.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 110W.

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅33.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 93.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.6 vs 14.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 110W instead of 150W, a 40W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 220mm instead of 241mm, a 21mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 33.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 660 Ti instead at 4,415 vs 4,260, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 660 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 3 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 93.6% (28.6 vs 14.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 660 Ti has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 660 Ti vs Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 16 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,415 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,260 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti scores 4,415 and the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 reaches 4,260 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 975 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
G3D Mark Score
4,415+4%
4,260
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344+5%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS+6%
2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
980 MHz
975 MHz
ROPs
24
32+33%
TMUs
112+40%
80
L1 Cache
112 KB
384 KB+243%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 660 Ti gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 144.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 179.2 GB/s (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — a 24.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
VRAM Capacity
3 GB+50%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
179.2 GB/s+24%
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
384 KB
512 KB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
DirectX
12 (FL 11_0)
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.1
1.2+9%
OpenGL
4.3
4.6+7%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 660 Ti draws 150W versus the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370's 110W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 220mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 97°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
TDP
150W
110W-27%
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
241mm
220mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
97°C
70-28%
Perf/Watt
29.4
38.7+32%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 660 Ti came in at $299, while the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.8 (GeForce GTX 660 Ti) vs 28.6 (Radeon R9 270 / R7 370) — the Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 offers 93.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 660 TiRadeon R9 270 / R7 370
MSRP
$299
$149-50%
Performance per Dollar
14.8
28.6+93%
Codename
GK104
Trinidad
Release
August 16 2012
May 5 2015
Ranking
#472
#456
Search GeForce GTX 660 Ti on AmazonSearch Radeon R9 270 / R7 370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.